Search for: "State v. Sales"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 20,854
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
Hewitt, 329 U.S. 249, 252-53 (1946)) or “No State has the right to lay a tax on interstate commerce in any form” (Leloup v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 4:30 am
It puts a barrier on sales that will exclude most out-of-state wineries. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 7:24 am
The irony is that the money the states and local governments receive from Washington is derived either from federal taxes paid by residents of the states or from the sale of bonds that their children will have to redeem. . . . [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:08 pm
– When a business' operations span multiple counties, where does a retail sale tax place for purposes of the local portion of the state sales tax? [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:31 am
Brain Pharma, LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:05 am
Troice and Proskauer Rose LLP v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 5:23 am
Adams v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
Not for Publication United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
Specifically, the Pinti court stated that the case would apply to foreclosure sales of properties subject to mortgages containing similar provisions, for which the notice of default is sent after the date of the Pinti opinion. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 9:24 pm
The sale of articles in the United States under a United States patent cannot be controlled by foreign laws. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:25 am
This is Congress' response to United States v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:41 am
United States, holding that the federal income tax liability resulting from petitioners’ post-petition farm sale is not incurred by the estate under Section 503(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and thus is neither collectible nor dischargeable in the Chapter 12 plan. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:25 am
This is Congress' response to United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 2:33 pm
See Dacres v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:30 am
Passarella v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
Reliable Consultants, Inc. v. [read post]
Supreme Court, by a 4-4 vote, Affirms the Ninth Circuit’s Restrictive Reading of First Sale Doctrine
15 Dec 2010, 2:56 pm
In Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
