Search for: "State v. T. R. O."
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2012, 2:43 pm
The court held that “[t]o the extent the entry of summary judgment may have been premised upon the court’s conclusion that the noncompetition agreement lacked consideration, we also reverse. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:23 am
Justice O’Connor had a concurring opinion that struck the law down using the Equal Protection Clause, since the Texas statute, unlike the one in Bowers v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
R. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:46 am
The July 11 Opinion In a scholarly and detailed July 11, 2014 opinion written by Justice Keith R. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
It also allows law enforcement “[t]o photograph gatherings to which the general public is invited on public or private land. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:30 am
(Patently-O) (Patent Arcade) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Nintendo – IA Labs files patent infringement suit against Nintendo relating to Wii devices and software (Patent Arcade) US Copyright How Twitter’s grant to the Library of Congress could be copyright-ok (Internet Cases) Library of Congress: We’re archiving every tweet ever made (Ars Technica) US government study: Counterfeiting and piracy data unreliable (Michael Geist) (Public… [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 pm
“We continue to focus on transnational repression, where Chinese authorities have reached into the United States and other countries to repress people critical of Chinese policies. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
Hobby Lobby and Zubik v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Don’t take my word for it, just read Geoffrey R. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 7:22 pm
& Park Ave. at Exactly 10 o'clock tomorrow (Thursday) morning. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
’: Tribunal Practice Notice 6/2009 Requirement to attend hearings in relations to applications for invalidation where there are grounds of invalidation under sections 5(1), 5(2), 5(3) and/or 5(4) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 (IPKat) Why automotive engineers don’t end up as patent infringers – Ian Hartwell reports findings of survey of UK and German engineering companies (IPKat) Web Sheriff takes on Jamie Oliver for dressing like member of The Village People without… [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:58 pm
For details, see the opinion, Smallwood v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:53 pm
" Maybe Administrator Babbitt got it right when he concluded his remarks by stating that "if you think the safety bar is set too high, your sights are set way too low. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am
Colting (IP Watch) Don’t let ASCAP’s president be silenced (Creative [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege waived? [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 10:13 pm
Among the powers specifically delegated to the federal government is the power "[t]o regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:05 am
If that doesn’t happen, the Medicaid case is going to be an extremely important ruling no matter who wins; probably the most important Spending Clause case since the 1930s, or at least since South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Safley, and, more specifically, their free exercise claims were subjected to rationality review under O’Lone v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 4:30 am
Supreme Court's decision O'Connor v. [read post]
