Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 40,642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
That sounds like reining in the administrative state! [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 10:55 am
In a decision issued on March 13, 2008, the Delaware Chancery Court in JANA Master Fund, Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 9:02 pm
The state of Louisiana included the candidates' statements in its latest filing seeking rehearing of Kennedy v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 1:52 am
Ganim v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:15 am
Since its 1943 decision Parker v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 5:57 am
In King v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 2:33 pm
of the opinion:"A variation on this view culminated in Brandenburg v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
” Some amici, such as Professor Kurt Lash, have filed briefs arguing that the presidency is not a “disqualified” office covered by the Positions Clause—in other words, that Section 3 permits someone to serve as President (or Vice-President) even if they are a covered person who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States (indeed, even if they’ve “given aid or comfort” to… [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:05 pm
Although the words that follow are Herrmann's, the thought is largely Rob's.Riegel says that the Medical Device Amendments do "not prevent a State from providing a damages remedy for claims premised on a violation of FDA regulations; the state duties in such a case 'parallel,' rather than add to, federal requirements. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Lane in 2004 and United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 6:15 pm
Goldstein v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:30 am
Seminole Rock & Sand Co., in which it stated without citation to precedent or other explanation that, when the meaning of the words in an agency’s regulation are in doubt, “the administrative interpretation . . . becomes of controlling weight unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:33 pm
The Court of Appeals holds that municipal regulation on this subject isn't preempted by state law.The Ninth Circuit delivered its last word on the subject around a year ago. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 7:05 am
Related Musings:English v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 2:23 am
The Court determined that the obvious and only natural interpretation of the document was that the Council was approving what was applied for: the variation of one condition from the original wording to the proposed wording, in effect substituting one for the other. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 9:20 am
A couple things to note: State Action. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 6:54 am
The case, American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 11:39 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 2:50 pm
O’Connell v Director of Elections, Bureau of Elections and the Department of State. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 11:42 am
In other words, something went wrong during the process of making the product. [read post]
