Search for: "Stephens v. United States"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 3,220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
The text limits and directs government and future lawmaking, with the United States offering the paradigm example. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:30 pm
Justice Stephen Breyer did not take part in the decision because his brother, a judge in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, sat on the Ninth Circuit panel that had decided the matter under review. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:58 pm
V. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:38 am
Justice Kagan pointed out that in a prior case (United States v. $8,850, a 1983 forfeiture case), the Court had ruled that “we’re going to do a due process analysis, but we’re going to take the [Speedy Trial Clause] Barker factors as our test. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:51 am
United Business Machines, Inc., D2001-0577 (WIPO June 6, 2001); Government of Canada v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 1:17 pm
Stephens, 31 P.3d 465, 471 (Or. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 4:07 am
United States and Collins v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:37 pm
Frederick (06-278) also should count as a 5-4 decision because Justice Stephen G. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:42 pm
At issue in Carson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:00 am
Political Backing v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:43 pm
United States, about a “knowingly” provision of a federal firearm statute. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:19 am
Harris v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
In the post 9/11 world the men and women in the United States Navy and United States Coast Guard are on call twenty-four hours a day monitoring commercial and private vessels on the high seas. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 8:27 pm
(People v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 6:57 am
ShareMonday’s argument in Siegel v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 4:39 pm
National Pride at Work v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
July 2, 2009). http://kuex.us/71aa Doc Retention and Destruction: United States v. [read post]
