Search for: "Stevens v. Thomas"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2007, 9:35 am
The Court heard argument on Monday in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 12:41 pm
" Notably, a petition for a writ of certiorari presenting that issue is currently before the Court in Quarterman v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 3:49 am
The most important example is the willingness of Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices Sclaia and Thomas to sign the per curiam opinion in Bush v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:11 pm
As in Smith v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:41 am
"
"Justice Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, and John Paul Stevens joined in the majority; Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:32 am
Texas; Stevens wrote the other two, Abdul-Kamir v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:17 am
Abdul-Kabir v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 2:15 am
Scalia and Thomas have already written a majority opinion, but so have Stevens and Ginsburg. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
" Apprendi v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
" Apprendi v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 12:25 pm
The Senate itself has lined up on ex-employee Hanson's side, and its assistant legal counsel, Thomas E. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 2:55 pm
In yesterday's Post, HealthDay reporter Steven Reinberg had this story on the Court's ruling and its medical implications. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:06 pm
" (p. 28; emphasis supplied.)Also, as expected, Justices Ginsburg, Stevens, Souter and Breyer dissented. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:45 am
See Cutter v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:42 am
The summary of the Court's opinion in James v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:32 am
In his concurrence, Justice Thomas states: "I write separately to reiterate my view that the Court's abortion jurisprudence, including Casey and Roe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
Souter and John Paul Stevens. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:41 am
The Thomas concurrence, joined by Scalia, reaffirms their view tha Roe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
The ruling came in James v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 9:30 pm
" Geier v. [read post]
