Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 1981 - 2000 of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2007, 3:11 pm
Congress could have expressly limited the Rule's application to specific acts, but it did not do so.On part two Judge Baker found error, but ultimately held no prejudice under the constitutional standard (harmless beyond a reasonable doubt), citing United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:11 pm by Jarod Bona
The FTC has admirably been a strong proponent of applying the antitrust laws to state and local governments. [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Judgment Warby J cited the relevant principles on meaning from paras 11 to 12 of Koutsogiannis v The Random House Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 48 (QB). [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm by INFORRM
If he did not, were the police liable for defamation when they stated publicly, several years later, that he probably had? [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 9:20 am by Tyson Snow
But there is another case out there to consider when evaluating ownership of social media accounts:  Eagle v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:54 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Mendoza v Silva, 2013 WL 6491479 (N.D.Iowa) Plaintiff Maria Guadalupe Aguilar Mendoza, a citizen of Mexico, filed an action to secure the return of her daughters, five-year-old K.G.M.A. and four-year-old M.K.M.A.. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:46 am by Inside Privacy
 Andrus Ansip is nominally the “team leader” on the reforms, with Věra Jourová, Günther Oettinger and Dimitris Avramopoulos competing to be heard on the balance between fundamental rights, business freedoms and the powers of public authorities (e.g. state surveillance), respectively. [read post]
2 May 2007, 9:26 am
The First Department noted the recent Court of Appeals decisions in Miceli v State Farm Mut. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:26 pm
It’s rare to see a child porn case challenged on the sufficiency of the evidence itself, but that was the situation in Wise v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:55 pm by Theodore Harvatin
Thus, the Williams court held: “to the extent that Strong v. [read post]