Search for: "Study v. State" Results 1981 - 2000 of 15,006
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2019, 6:57 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Finally, Section V identifies some best practices and evaluates response strategies. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:27 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Rev. 517 (2016); Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by INFORRM
The right to privacy for a European head of state has hardly been more topical. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:36 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  See R.C.M. 705(c)(1)(B) (“A term or condition in a pretrial agreement shall not be enforced if it deprives the accused of: . . . the complete and effective exercise of post-trial and appellate rights”); see also United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 1:51 pm by S2KM Limited
To help evaluate these numbers, compare the Annual Studies of United States Tort Costs published by Towers Watson (formerly Towers Perrin) since 1985. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am by John Elwood
Sims, 12-1217, and the trio of state-on-top habeas cases, Ryan v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:25 am by Mike
House disguised as a Barn In Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2011] UKSC 15 Lord Hope describe the actions of Mr Beesely thus: "Frankly, the dishonesty involved in this case is so far removed from almost anything else that I have ever encountered in this area of the law that it appears to constitute a category all of its own. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:25 am by Mike
House disguised as a Barn In Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2011] UKSC 15 Lord Hope describe the actions of Mr Beesely thus: "Frankly, the dishonesty involved in this case is so far removed from almost anything else that I have ever encountered in this area of the law that it appears to constitute a category all of its own. [read post]