Search for: "Sunday v State"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,613
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2011, 4:24 pm
X, C-509/09 and Martinez v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 8:31 pm
The CCA order in Skinner v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:59 pm
H. and Others v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:49 pm
Will the State Bar act again? [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 2:49 pm
UPDATED Sunday 6:32 p.m. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 5:38 am
The employment law Case of the Week is Walker v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:50 pm
In its recent judgment in Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10 eDate Advertising GmbH v X and Olivier Martinez v MGN Ltd (25 October 2011), the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union has laid down a radical new rule of jurisdiction over torts committed online, giving claimants the choice of suing in their home courts. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 4:51 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Walker v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
In Yuin University v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
United States, a case that presents questions about the relationship between religious speech and political speech for purposes of tax exemptions. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am
The European Court of Justice has ruled that Oliver Martinez, a French actor, can bring a privacy legal action in France over an article which appeared on a British paper’s website, the Sunday Mirror. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:44 am
In Walker v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am
On this blog, Orin Kerr previewed the search-related issue presented in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:35 am
V. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 8:34 am
You want to overturn Roe v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 9:52 am
On similar facts in State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 5:19 pm
On similar facts in State v. [read post]
