Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2016, 9:39 am
No matter how carefully they expressed their motivation to the consuming public, their sales would be crippled. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
"For one thing, Waggoner responded, renting out a hotel room isn't a form of artistic expression or speech deserving of protection. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:16 am
Cisco Tech. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 9:13 am
updates us on another landmark judgment from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in C‑582/14 Breyer v Bundesrepublik Deutschland concerning the proper characterisation of IP addresses and the compatibility of German national law with Article 7(f) of the Data Protection Directive. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:17 pm
For example, read the amicus brief filed by the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. in the AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:11 am
Specifically, Star Athletica v Varsity Brands poses the question whether copyright law protects the uniform designs of market leader Varsity Brands from copying by upstart rival Star Athletica. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), the consumer protection regulator, is stepping up to stop social media influencers promoting or reviewing products or services without disclosing compensation or other consideration that they’ve received for such endorsements. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:41 am
IMatthew David Brozik blogged here about Tiffany v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:49 am
Arsenal v Reed). [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:33 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm
Patrick Gray, in facilitating the cover-up. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 3:26 am
Of particular interest is clause 26 on "infringing copyright and making available right" [isn't the making available right one of the rights granted by copyright?] [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 11:04 am
Why can’t UDRP adversaries just get along like these cute Swarovski bunnies? [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 7:03 am
Board of Regents of the Univ. of Houston Sys. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:34 am
Electrology Laboratory, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
It began its analysis of this issue by explaining that theFourth Amendment provides that `[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:12 pm
But ultimately you may have to go to the source.Hogan: courts in the US are there to protect US businesses and US consumers. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 8:16 am
Don’t want a situation where people don’t even bother with design patents, given their increasing use in fashion where there hasn’t been protection in the past. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 12:02 pm
Certain designs are protected by copyright. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 6:07 am
Washington v. [read post]
