Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 4,753
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2015, 11:09 am
Specifically, Judge Laura Taylor Swain ruled that the evidence established that Costco had infringed Tiffany’s trademarks by selling engagement rings and had confused consumers by using the word Tiffany in display cases. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
Snyder; Tango v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:12 pm
I reference the EEOC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 4:27 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 7:31 am
Washington v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:25 am
The title -- "IP in 2015 - Where we are v Where I thought we'd be" -- is broad enough to suit all tastes and a multiplicity of interpretations. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 4:06 pm
In addition to AMC, there are a number of other Court decisions to note: Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors [2015] EWHC 2366 (Ch), dismissing a subject access request against solicitors by the beneficiaries of a trust. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
I’ve recently been blogging about my new article, The Inherent-Powers Corollary: Judicial Non-Delegation and Federal Common Law, which I’ve posted to SSRN. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:17 am
Descarga y lee el caso Bell v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:29 pm
Last week, in Bell v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 5:32 am
In Dawson-Damer v Taylor Wessing (2015), the Court refused to order compliance with a DSAR against the law firm. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 11:46 am
En banc Fifth Circuit decides student off-campus First Amendment free speech dispute in Taylor Bell v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 9:17 am
Thus there was no need to rely on a generic definition of conspiracy, as would usually be the case under Taylor v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 7:00 am
On July 1st, Roger V. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
Taylor Rental Ctr., Inc., 458 So. 2d 845, 846 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 6:13 pm
In State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 8:04 am
In Harrington v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 6:28 pm
Nonetheless, the appeals court determined that the challenge to the department’s general diagnosis provision was properly dismissed because it was neither “intended to reveal” nor “necessitates revealing a disability” (Taylor v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 7:50 am
Bahamas Source Wikipedia Reproduced under a Creative Commons Licence Probably because it implements an EU directive and costs small business owners money to support a bureaucracy in Wilmslow and is cited by petty officials as an excuse for all sorts of irritations the Data Protection Act 1998 is one of the least understood and most maligned and least appreciated Acts of [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 1:41 am
Taylor, 353 U.S. 569 (1957). [read post]
