Search for: "Texas v. United States"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 8,320
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm
Supreme Court in 1869, ruled that Texas did NOT have a right to secede, in the case, Texas v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am
United States and Shaw v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:47 am
State, 2012 WL 4903044 (Texas Court of Appeals 2012). [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:29 pm
In Carl v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:02 pm
The Fourteenth Amendment extends the Confrontation Clause to also apply in all state criminal proceedings, including those in Texas. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:12 pm
Under Texas state law, "there is a rebuttable presumption that the defendant . . . manufacturer . . . [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
United States of America et al., a case heard in the United States District Court Central District of California by Judge Virginia A. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 10:32 am
Texas and Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 1:39 pm
Finally, it is important to note that Crypto.com chose to file this Complaint in the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 6:48 am
State, 181 S.W.3d 359, 366 (Texas Criminal Court of Appeals 2005) (war [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:10 am
State, 2013 WL 4680510 (Court of Appeals of Texas 2013). [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:26 am
United States (OT 2009) Harjo v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:26 am
United States (OT 2009) Harjo v. [read post]
24 Sep 2024, 7:00 pm
Just over a month ago, employers throughout the United States breathed a sigh of relief after Judge Ada Brown in the Northern District of Texas issued a summary judgment ruling in the Ryan v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 10:00 am
District Judge Ada Brown of the Northern District of Texas struck down a proposed rule by the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that sought to impose a nationwide ban on non-compete agreements. [read post]
26 May 2008, 3:43 am
" The United States Constitution similarly requires that, "[i]n Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:58 pm
V. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:48 am
The Special Supreme Court of Texas handed down its lone opinion in the case of Johnson v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:40 pm
” This provision, section two of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), was not at issue in the 2014 Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:08 am
United States v. [read post]
