Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 1981 - 2000 of 11,377
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
District Court for the Central District of California determined that videos that used footage from another content creator in order to criticize and comment on the original videos did not violate copyright. 139 F. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:43 am by Jihee Ahn
Superior Court of California, Solano Cty., 480 U.S. 102 (1987); Glencore Grain Rotterdam B.V. v. [read post]
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 1:19 pm by NBlack
Most recently, California joined their ranks, and became the 39th state to adopt this duty when the California Supreme Court approved the new rule on Feb. 18, 2021. [read post]
As a threshold matter, the panel determined that the dormant Commerce Clause (whose aim is to limit economic protectionism through regulations designed to benefit in-state economic interests by burdening out-of-state competitors) did not bar application of the California Labor Code to interstate employers, and that certain federal statutes did not preempt the California Labor Code’s application to interstate employers operating across state… [read post]
As a threshold matter, the panel determined that the dormant Commerce Clause (whose aim is to limit economic protectionism through regulations designed to benefit in-state economic interests by burdening out-of-state competitors) did not bar application of the California Labor Code to interstate employers, and that certain federal statutes did not preempt the California Labor Code’s application to interstate employers operating across state… [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:46 pm by Corynne McSherry
State law claims are normally barred under Section 230, a law has enabled decades of innovation and online expression. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 11:31 am by Lauren Shoor (US)
” The Chamber moved for a preliminary injunction barring new lawsuits brought by the State and any private enforcer seeking to enforce Proposition 65 against businesses who do not warn consumers that acrylamide in food is “known to the State of California to cause cancer. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 11:31 am by Lauren Shoor (US)
” The Chamber moved for a preliminary injunction barring new lawsuits brought by the State and any private enforcer seeking to enforce Proposition 65 against businesses who do not warn consumers that acrylamide in food is “known to the State of California to cause cancer. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 8:00 am by Joanna Herzik
Someone hacked their State Bar page and is misrepresenting them as their attorney. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 8:28 am by Evan Schwartz
The court denied dismissal, stating that the ballpark was made unusable for its intended function due to the presence of the virus. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Court Reinstates Guilty Verdicts Against Flynn Partner Over Turkey Lobbying Politico – Josh Gerstein | Published: 3/17/2021 A federal appeals court reinstated a jury’s guilty verdicts on the business partner of former Trump administration national security adviser Michael Flynn over the pair’s lobbying for Turkish interests during the 2016 presidential campaign. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 11:55 am by Legal Aggregate
The weapon used in the Boulder shooting was an AR-15-style rifle—bought after the Colorado State court struck down the city’s ban. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 3:26 pm by Unknown
United States (Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium; FTCA)State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlMoyant v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 9:06 am by skelly
This state law does not reference any prohibitions that might exist by virtue of the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”). [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 8:11 am by Bob Ambrogi
” The California Supreme Court approved the new rule on Feb. 18, 2021, which appears as Comment 1 to Rule 1.1 of California’s professional conduct rules. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 1:08 pm by Ilya Somin
But I also think this issue is irrelevant to the question before the Court: whether the California law creates a per se taking. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Small Data, not (Only) Big Data: Personalized Law and Using Information from Previous Proceedings, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2020, pp. 331-404, Benjamin Shmueli, Bar- [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 10:59 am by Matthew D. Roy
The implication of a stipulation entered into by a creditor in a bankruptcy action on future claims was the topic of an opinion recently issued by a California court, in a case in which the debtor argued the IRS was barred from recovering taxes from the debtor. [read post]