Search for: "Three S Consulting v. US" Results 1981 - 2000 of 5,357
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2017, 1:55 am
W-02(IPCV)(A)-511 -03/2016)).BREAKING: US Supreme Court holds cheerleading uniforms eligible for copyright protectionThe US copyright decision everybody was waiting for is finally out – in Star Athletica v Varsity Brands the US Supreme Court has just ruled that cheerleading uniforms are eligible for copyright protection. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 8:57 am by Matthew J. Roberts, Esq.
Employers who wish to continue using mandatory arbitration agreements are still strongly encouraged to consult legal counsel to evaluate risks and benefits to using arbitration agreements. [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:00 am by 1 Crown Office Row
This is Part 2 of a three part series which originally appeared on Inforrm’s Blog. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by umbrella
Call us at 1-844-769-0737, or contact us online to schedule an initial consultation. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by umbrella
Call us at 1-844-769-0737, or contact us online to schedule an initial consultation. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 1:33 pm
Unlike Judge Brown’s concurrence, the majority’s decision seems to run counter to two of the three principles set forth at the outset of this post. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:42 pm by Stephen Page
In paragraph 75 of her affidavit filed on 6 September 2013 the mother identifies those three “data gaps” as follows:...Transcript – Data gaps There are three areas of transcript which I say are missing. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 11:31 am by Nathan Swire
This portion of the act was written in response to the ruling of Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
: IPO announces public consultation on trade mark fees (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (Out-Law) (IPKat) US Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Patent Reform Act 2009 (Inventive Step) (Patent Prospector) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Law360) (Hal Wegner)   Global Global - General The global economic crisis and the intellectual property ecosystem IP Think Tank podcast 6 March 2009 (IP… [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:43 am by Ben Luftman
Contact us at (614) 500-3836 today to schedule a free, initial consultation of your case. [read post]