Search for: "U.S. v. Rolle" Results 1981 - 2000 of 2,202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2009, 11:48 am
  The question of whether to roll back federal pre-emption has simmered since last year’s Supreme Court decision in Riegel v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for Roll Call, Walter Shapiro suggests that the Kavanaugh pick might not be as safe as it seems. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 6:35 am by Jonathan Bailey
” A 2010 Fourth Circuit case, Universal Furniture International, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 7:09 pm by Jon Gelman
 The initial state workers’ compensation programs were enacted in 1911, which makes workmen’s compensation (as the program was known until the 1970s) the oldest social insurance program in the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:48 am by Alex Phipps
In March of 2021, an Asheville police officer observed defendant roll through a stop sign. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
The Constitution does not say anything about vesting of judicial power, unlike the U.S Constitution[6]. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 5:59 am by Menachem Z. Rosensaft
These are the folks who would want to roll back segregation, for whom Loving v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by William Ford
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm by Scott R. Anderson, Margaret Taylor
During a vote or call of the roll in the House, each proxy is allowed to vote on behalf of the members they are representing so long as they acknowledge their proxy status and have received “exact instruction[s]” from the absent member they are representing in advance. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am by Carrie Cordero, Quinta Jurecic
In response to public outcry, the order instead requires the secretary of homeland security to detain immigrant families together “to the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations” and directs the Justice Department to amend the consent decree reached in Flores v. [read post]