Search for: "United States v. California" Results 1981 - 2000 of 13,833
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2012, 11:19 am by rlargent@cdflaborlaw.com
The United States Supreme Court then provided what appears to be bright line guidance on this issue in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:20 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
The covenant itself must only prohibit competitive activity requiring the use of trade secrets. -- Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of California Opinion Date: 7/1/11 Cite: Richmond Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:11 pm by rlargent@cdflaborlaw.com
Largent This week a California court held that the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
  United States District Courts in California oversee some of the largest caseloads in the country.[1] Understandably reluctant to see their dockets expand, these courts often look for grounds to remand cases to state court. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
 The University of California Press has published Reproduction Reconceived: Family Making and the Limits of Choice After Roe v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:27 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 3:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
LERNER,No. 08-4991-cv;UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT;2009 U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:06 am by Spencer Persson
On June 19, 2017, the United States Supreme Court limited the ability of plaintiffs to pursue mass consumer actions in state court. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:50 am by Sheppard Mullin
George King of the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an order in Pedroza v. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 12:36 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]