Search for: "United States v. Choice"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 6,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2010, 10:54 am
That intense experience in representing the United States in briefing and arguing cases before the Court over most of two Terms cannot be duplicated in any other capacity. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
In a crushing blow to consumers, on Thursday, February 21st, the United States Supreme Court again sided with big pharmaceutical medical device makers. [read post]
30 May 2007, 3:52 am
United States, 40 F.3d 1096, 1102 n. 5 (10th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1107, 115 S.Ct. 1957, 131 L.Ed.2d 849 (1995) ("While this case does not require us to decide whether the government must affirmatively advise [an employee of his rights under Garrity ], other circuits arguably have adopted such a requirement. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 5:23 pm
The findings state that the valid-when-made doctrine is an “important and longstanding principle [that] derives from the common law and its application has been a cornerstone of United States banking law for nearly 200 years. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 1:26 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:23 am
United States, Assistant to the Solicitor General Ann O’Connell drew that straw. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 9:04 am
In Kousisis v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:21 am
However, in the last fifty years, the United States has removed those values of relying on one’s self and neighbors. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
In a recent case addressing the novel issue of whether foreign law trumped United States law for purposes of class action tolling, the U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 7:18 am
Following Goldsmith was Thomas Hungar, Deputy Solicitor General, arguing on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae supporting the petitioners. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 11:47 am
See State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 11:47 am
See State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:51 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 3:27 am
When the United States Supreme Court takes a case and rules, it applies to all. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
This opinion in Robinson v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:28 am
Generally, plaintiff's Heathcote's choice of forum would be given deference, but in false marking cases the United States is the real party in interest. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:41 pm
There's an appeal there, too, we're told.An even worse pick.Finally, today the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in the fourth bisphosphonate case, Stevens. [read post]
29 May 2008, 6:55 am
To the Chief Justice - and to the United States, which had supported the employee’s reading of Section 1981 in CBOCS, and the plaintiff’s reading of Title IX in Jackson - that made all the difference. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:15 am
United States, you can read it here. [read post]
24 Apr 2025, 8:31 pm
The First Bank of the United States, championed by Hamilton and approved by Washington, likewise operated with meaningful independence from direct presidential control. [read post]
