Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 14,190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2008, 5:52 pm
Chandler issued his post-trial opinion in United Rentals, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:21 am
Ct. 2669; see also United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 5:46 am
In Shirley Lacko v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:47 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 12:49 pm
United States, a Florida man was convicted of illegally possessing a firearm as a felon. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:13 pm
By Jason Rantanen VirnetX, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 11:23 am
In any event, argues the United States, habeas is an inappropriate mechanism for attacking such conditions. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:44 pm
" Id. at 409 (quoting United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 3:49 am
First up is United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 11:11 am
United States Dep't of the Treasury, 2011 U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:13 am
In Aizkir Navigation Inc v Al Wathba National Insurance [2011] EWHC 3940 (Comm), the High Court considered a principle of contractual construction and held that a clause stating that claims "be settled in accordance with English Law and practice shall be so settled in Abu Dhabi (UAE)" amounted to an exclusive jurisdiction clause in favour of the United Arab Emirates (the UAE) and there was no overwhelming reason to displace that jurisdiction clause.The Claimant,… [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:05 am
”When Brown v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:42 am
In May 1954, Brown v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 8:19 pm
In a closely watched case pending in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the CFPB obtained a significant victory against CashCall Inc. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:09 pm
Sprint/United Management Co. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:41 am
” (Gorsuch was referring to United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 7:38 am
How closely should courts scrutinize the purpose and effect of state legislation regulating abortion? [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 9:11 pm
Earlier this month (on Friday, March 4), the Supreme Court of the United States already had Samsung's December 2015 petition for writ of certiorari (request for Supreme Court review) in Apple's design patents case on its agenda. [read post]
