Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 1981 - 2000 of 14,190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2022, 7:02 am by Abbe R. Gluck
” In this regard, it is interesting to note that the leading precedent the government relies on is United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 1:29 pm by Ronald Mann
Kagan, for example, seemed to embrace the argument of Anthony Yang (representing the United States, in support of the Pueblo) that “Cabazon is all over this statute. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:01 am by David A. Martin
It states that DHS “may return” a person “who arrives by land from a foreign territory contiguous to the United States” to that territory pending an immigration hearing. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 1:58 am by Andrea Gass
Supreme Court notes that in the early years of the twentieth century, the Western United States was a very different place. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
United States Sarah Palin has lost her libel claim against the New York Times. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm by Keith Mallinson
They state there that ’we present empirical evidence of “hold-up”—i.e., evidence of opportunistic behavior by SEP enforcers that is intended to unreasonably inflate royalties. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  Other cases cite Representative Kastenmeier’s statement that the law “specifically extends only to false and misleading speech that is encompassed within the ‘commercial speech’ doctrine developed by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
In Section 2202, the PRA provides that the United States owns “Presidential records. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Supreme Court case law states that "the guarantee of free exercise is not limited to beliefs which are shared by all of the members of a religious sect. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 8:22 pm by Florian Mueller
Gilstrap--whose more formal title is Chief United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas--handed down a scheduling order in the Ericsson v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 6:56 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals disagrees and the case returns to the criminal docket.The case is United States v. [read post]