Search for: "United States v. Felt"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,646
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2011, 9:30 am
Kowalski began the 1948 Spring Training season with Pueblo, but before the regular season began he was demoted to the Class B Asheville Tourists of the Tri-State League. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976), and Precision Instruments Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:56 pm
United States of America case, debtor Diego Rodriquez collected over $70,000 of disability benefits after returning to work. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:04 am
On March 2, 2011, the Supreme Court established in Snyder v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:11 am
Marques v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:58 am
Although the 2007 crack amendment helped to soften the disproportionality, the Commission observed even at the time that it “view[ed] the amendment only as a partial remedy to some of the problems associated with” the relative treatment of crack and powder.[5] Consistent with this position, the Commission’s 2010 survey of federal judges found that the overwhelming majority of respondents (70 percent) still felt that the guidelines ranges for crack offenses… [read post]
21 May 2011, 9:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 4:05 pm
As noted yesterday, CAAF’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 11:15 am
The case is E.M.B. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:40 pm
Connecticut the United States Supreme Court may indeed transform the way we produce and obtain energy. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:41 pm
In a landmark decision, the United States Supreme Court in Kentuckly v, King, Docket No.09-1272, held that warrantless searches are valid so long as a police officer knocks loudly, announces themselves and hears evidence being destroyed. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:42 am
LEARN IT, LIVE IT, LOVE IT SECURITIZATION The History of Financial Regulation in the United States What is Securitization? [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:14 am
On that last point, this action was transferred from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. [read post]
15 May 2011, 7:05 am
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:30 pm
The Court considered R(M) v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) as the leading case on s.21(1). [read post]
12 May 2011, 2:59 am
"I felt they were slow on the recall. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:50 am
Therefore, “an injury allegedly inflicted by digital piracy is felt throughout the United States, which necessarily includes New York. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:47 am
Therefore, “an injury allegedly inflicted by digital piracy is felt throughout the United States, which necessarily includes New York. [read post]
9 May 2011, 5:48 am
Clemens, supra (quoting In re United States, 441 F.3d 44 (1st Cir. 2006)). [read post]
