Search for: "V-lawyer"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 67,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2022, 7:47 am
In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:08 am
Wuterich, due to “wrangling” over lawyers. [read post]
14 May 2018, 10:27 am
Case study: In Bhandari v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 5:11 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday granted certiorari [Order List, PDF] in Arave v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 9:09 am
In oral arguments before the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] on Thursday, the DOJ argued that the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 5:57 pm
The Supreme Court granted petition re: the 28 USC 2254(d) deferential standard of review in the case of Bell v Kelly (SCOTUSwiki preview here). [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:02 am
There is a big debate in the First Circuit (Boston) over whether proceedings in the RIAA v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:01 pm
What steps in costs litigation are (non-Costs Lawyer) law costs draftsmen able to undertake? [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 10:09 am
This new article from Megan Connolly, a Toronto lawyer who blogs at www.torontoestatemonitor.com, talks about a new case from Ontario (Dhingra v. [read post]
29 Jun 2006, 7:46 pm
The request follows Thursday's US Supreme Court [official website] ruling in Hamdan v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:15 am
I wrote a blog post this morning on the Maryland Injury Lawyer Blog about the Maryland Court of Special Appeals' opinion in Tollenger v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 3:13 pm
As we’ve discussed, Birchfield v. [read post]
27 Sep 2004, 10:49 pm
In Tuesday's US law and business press, the Legal Times reports that more than 90 prominent lawyers are criticizing law clerks who gave behind-the-scenes details about Bush v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 2:00 am
Cohen (Pace), Whirlpool Financial Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 9:25 pm
Supreme Court's grant of review in this case in a post captioned "Redacted v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
So you may have read our previous post about the Beneke v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 11:42 am
In State of Michigan v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 8:29 am
The 2010 Supreme Court case Padilla v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 3:26 am
First, Ward v PSNI, in which the Lords ruled that it was lawful, under the Terrorism Act 2000, for a judge considering an extension of detention, so that the police could put new matters to a suspect in interview, to exclude the suspect and his lawyers from the hearing so as to make sure the questions would be on genuinely new matters while avoiding prejudice to the police [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:12 am
” The conference, which considered the implications of the Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
