Search for: "Weeks v. State of Me."
Results 1981 - 2000
of 6,233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2013, 4:28 pm
This is essentially the same scenario of Missouri v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm
One physician described a case of a patient who had ruptured membranes at 16-18 weeks’ gestation but was denied an abortion because of a new state law. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:43 pm
byJill Paperno, author ofRepresenting the Accused: A Practical Guide to Criminal DefenseAs the Supreme Court recognized this week in Riley v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 10:01 am
Stark of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware just entered an order referring a handful of Nokia patent cases against HTC and ViewSonic to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 4:37 am
Less NewsThe Dallas News' staff cuts on the eve of the Texas Legislature made me depressed. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 1:28 pm
Misrepresentation in the REDMA is defined as (a) a false or misleading statement of a material fact, or (b) an omission to state a material fact. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 1:28 pm
Misrepresentation in the REDMA is defined as (a) a false or misleading statement of a material fact, or (b) an omission to state a material fact. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:36 am
Earlier this week, I blogged about Hall v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 12:48 am
Your identities stay confidential with me. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:03 pm
Yes, it’s time to roll out Nix v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 11:54 am
Earlier this week on Slaw Evan Van Dyk asked about podcasts and got a number of good suggestions. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:23 pm
United States Tobacco (working paper, 2007). [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 6:30 am
In New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:12 am
Included in this form are paragraphs in which the defendant states (1) that he understands "that the possible questioning before the Grand Jury will not be limited to any specific subjects, matters or area of conduct; (2) that he understands that by signing the form he gives "up all immunity and privilege to which [he] would otherwise have been entitled under the provisions of the United States Constitution, the Constitution of the State of New… [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 8:08 am
In this week’s case (De Sousa v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 8:25 pm
In today’s case (Moore v. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 9:28 pm
In House of Representatives v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
Well…..The Fulton decision reminded me of Wisconsin v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:56 am
You promised me you'd only ask for two or three! [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 12:36 pm
”For a more recent, but factually rather different, § 403 case, see McMahon v. [read post]
