Search for: "Wheeles v. Wheeles"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,748
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2011, 8:19 am
`(B) OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE DEFINED- For purposes of this section, the term `off-highway vehicle'--`(i) means any motorized vehicle--`(I) that is manufactured primarily for use off public streets, roads, and highways;`(II) designed to travel on 2, 3, or 4 wheels; and`(III) that has either--`(aa) a seat designed to be straddled by the operator and handlebars for steering control; or`(bb) a nonstraddle seat, steering wheel, seat belts, and roll-over protective structure; and`(ii)… [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 7:15 am
As Dan notes, the wheels of justice have moved slowly on this case. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 9:56 am
An 11th Circuit panel has issued this opinion in AAPD v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 7:30 am
In O’Brien v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:03 am
When a wheel somehow fell into a hole in the ramp, the worker twisted and strained his neck. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:16 pm
Anthony in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:10 am
WINELAND v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:35 pm
" In 1993, the constitutionality of this law was challenged by motorcycle enthusiasts in the case of Buhl v Hannigan. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:38 am
We know tired and fatigued drivers fall into “micro or mini-sleeps” when they literally are asleep at the wheel - the wheel of an 80,000 pound metal missile driving down our roads. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 5:03 am
I write this as Michigan’s auto accident injury law embodied in McCormick v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:33 pm
(Dixon v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:30 pm
Indeed, in PLIVA Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 12:28 pm
Kitchens, State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
In Al-Rawi the government departments’ primary case was that a court has the power to substitute this much simplified procedure for the traditional PII exercise, and that there was no reason in principle why the court could not exercise its inherent jurisdiction to oil the wheels of a wider category of case where a defendant cannot deploy its defence fully (or sometimes not at all) if it is required to follow an open procedure. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
-Some key ex-US issues in drafting the specification: China: Article 26 interpretation on claim scope and biological test data EPO: Article 123(2) added Matter Rule does not permit taking one feature from the specification and generalizing it in a claim (amendment must be “directly & unambiguously derivable” from the disclosure) Canada: :Eli Lilly v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
-Some key ex-US issues in drafting the specification: China: Article 26 interpretation on claim scope and biological test data EPO: Article 123(2) added Matter Rule does not permit taking one feature from the specification and generalizing it in a claim (amendment must be “directly & unambiguously derivable” from the disclosure) Canada: :Eli Lilly v. [read post]
Cisco Attack On VirnetX On Network Security Patent Among Reexamination Requests Filed Week Of 7/5/11
13 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
Patent No. 7,178,880 entitled WHEEL CENTERING PIN, KIT AND METHOD and owned by Tru-Balance. [read post]
Cisco Attack On VirnetX On Network Security Patent Among Reexamination Requests Filed Week Of 7/5/11
13 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
Patent No. 7,178,880 entitled WHEEL CENTERING PIN, KIT AND METHOD and owned by Tru-Balance. [read post]
