Search for: "cf" Results 1981 - 2000 of 5,168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2011, 10:01 am by PaulKostro
Super. 483, 485-86 (Law Div. 1981) (holding that plaintiff could be required to provide authorizations for defendant to receive documents within her control but not her possession); cf. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 3:39 am by David Lynn
Further, a new "Staff Guidance and Interpretations" section in the left column of the page consolidates all of the legal and accounting guidance, including the CD&Is, the Financial Reporting Manual, No-Action, Interpretive and Exemptive Letters, SABs, SLBs, CF Disclosure Guidance and Division Policy Statements. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 7:20 am
And — unless copyright law has changed since I last looked — that sort of satire isn’t necessarily a protected First Amendment use of a copyrighted tune, cf. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 3:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
She did not submit an affidavit setting forth her version of the initial conversations with defendants or any other interactions that would support her attorney’s contentions that she was under a reasonable impression that defendants had agreed to represent her on a personal injury claim or that the law firm did not clearly disclaim representation (see Zuckerman v New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980] [an attorney affirmation is insufficient to put before the court facts of which she has no… [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 2:26 pm by Buce
Cf. this guy, or this guy.Afterthought: nine months it took the judge to come up with his opinion. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:03 pm
This has the result that the invention of claims 1 and 25 as granted falls under the prohibition of A 53(a) EPC taken in combination with R 28(c) EPC (cf. also G 2/06 [29]). [4] In agreement with decision G 1/03 the amended claims 1 and 25, both containing a disclaimer not removing more than what is necessary to disclaim subject-matter falling under the prohibition of A 53(a) EPC in combination with R 28(c) EPC, meet the requirements of A 123(2) EPC. [7] The present disclaimers… [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:23 am by Diogo B. Fazolo
"O excesso de prazo, quando exclusivamente imputável ao aparelho judiciário - não derivando, portanto, de qualquer fato procrastinatório causalmente atribuível ao réu - traduz situação anômala que compromete a efetividade do processo, pois, além de tornar evidente o desprezo estatal pela liberdade do cidadão, frustra um direito básico que assiste a qualquer pessoa: o direito à resolução do… [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 12:01 pm
Unfortunately, CF News 13 reports that it isn't only drunk drivers we need to be concerned about. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:09 pm
CF/CG Leia mais: 16/09/2011 - Prisão preventiva de acusado por receptação de veículo e falsificação de documento é questionada no STF   [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 12:03 pm
CF/CG Leia mais: 7/4/2011 – CNS questiona decisão trabalhista sobre periculosidade por radiação   [read post]