Search for: "Application of Smith"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 7,621
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2020, 10:40 am
To Senators Blumenthal, Van Hollen, Smith, Warren, and Booker: Thank you, sincerely, for investigating these apps. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 6:02 am
The Plaintiff attempted to request a retroactive application of a recent U.S. [read post]
28 May 2020, 7:59 am
For additional questions, employers should contact one of the knowledgeable attorneys in Reed Smith’s experienced Labor and Employment Group. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 11:00 pm
On one view, this is somewhat surprising, given that it is a Federal Circuit Court decision dealing with an application of summary dismissal. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:43 am
P. 42 (“Rule 42”) consolidation in patent infringement cases post-enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”). [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 11:17 am
Smith, 574 F.2d 988 (9th Cir. 1978)(sodomy); United States v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 4:43 pm
" stories seem to generate more buzz than the actual application itself. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:44 am
Smith, neutral laws of general applicability do not violate the Free Exercise Clause, and no one disputes that the Americans with Disabilities Act is a neutral law of general applicability. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 5:59 am
Posted by Alex Wyman, Colleen Smith, and Kristin Murphy, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Wednesday, April 13, 2022 Editor's Note: Alex Wyman, Colleen Smith, and Kristin Murphy are partners at Latham & Watkins LLP. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 8:25 am
Plaintiff Ana Black, a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Madeline Black, respectfully submits the following memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to Defendant Smith's expressed intent to elicit expert opinions from Plaintiff's expert, anesthesiologist Richard Lee, M.D., regarding the applicable standard of care for plastic surgeon Donald Goldberg, M.D., and the nursing staff of Memorial Hospital (hereinafter "MH"), and to opine regarding… [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 11:30 am
Smith, neutral laws of general applicability do not violate the Free Exercise Clause, and no one disputes that the ADA is a neutral law of general applicability. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Smith - Click here for more information on David Smith. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 5:59 am
Posted by Alex Wyman, Colleen Smith, and Kristin Murphy, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Wednesday, April 13, 2022 Editor's Note: Alex Wyman, Colleen Smith, and Kristin Murphy are partners at Latham & Watkins LLP. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:55 pm
Smith, neutral laws of general applicability do not violate the Free Exercise Clause, and no one disputes that the ADA is a neutral law of general applicability. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:07 am
Rosen said Friday that an 18-month investigation uncovered a two-tiered policy for the concealed gun permits: a process for regular citizens whose applications were destined for a filing cabinet, and another for VIPs whose applications were fast-tracked for approval…. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 7:34 am
The court concluded that the City’s proposed contractual terms stated a neutral and generally applicable policy under Smith. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:21 am
Smith (212) 332-5024 ksmith@sheppardmullin.com [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:51 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Faith Stewart v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWCA Civ 907 (29 July 2011) Suckrajh, R (on the application of) v The Asylum & Immigration Tribunal & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 938 (29 July 2011) Iqbal v Ahmed [2011] EWCA Civ 900 (29 July 2011) Hayes v Merseyside Police [2011] EWCA Civ 911 (29 July 2011) Austin & Ors v Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 928 (29 July 2011) Modi & Anor v Clarke [2011] EWCA Civ 937 (29… [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 7:12 am
While the application was made in the context of a trade mark action, the judgment can be applied to UK IP litigation generally. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:15 pm
Nov. 23, 2011) deals with a legal question that touches on two interesting issues: (1) To what extent should the law try to protect religious or linguistic minority groups from generally applicable rules that have an unusually large impact on those minority groups? [read post]
