Search for: "Bills v. State" Results 2001 - 2020 of 21,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
That is, it was a derivative, extract, or cannabinoid originating from the cannabis plant and containing “not more than 0.3 percent” delta-9 THC (AK Futures LLC v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Yesterday the Arizona legislature gave final passage to HB2677 (full text) which repeals Arizona's 160-year-old near-total abortion ban that, according to the state Supreme Court, came back into effect when Roe v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:21 pm by Ann Marie Marciarille
I have been following Vermont's all-payer claims database litigation, Gobeille v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:08 am by ktidgren
The defendants removed the case to federal court and in Atay v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 9:53 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
Senate Bill 1848 [text, PDF] was passed in 2014 and put on hold [JURIST reports] by the state Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
A lawsuit was filed in a New York federal district court yesterday challenging the so-called Felder Amendment to New York state's 2018 Budget Bill. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
At issue in the case was the removal of FFRF's "Bill of Right Nativity Exhibit" from the Texas state capitol. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 10:00 am by J
That second claim is now been decided: Cala Homes (South) Ltd v (1) Secretary of State (2) Winchester City Council [2011] EWHC 97 (Admin). [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 10:00 am by J
That second claim is now been decided: Cala Homes (South) Ltd v (1) Secretary of State (2) Winchester City Council [2011] EWHC 97 (Admin). [read post]
29 May 2019, 1:45 pm by Eric Goldman
He’s Wrong * Senate’s “Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017”–and Section 230’s Imminent Evisceration * The “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017” Bill Would Be Bad News for Section 230 * WARNING: Draft “No Immunity for Sex Traffickers Online Act” Bill Poses Major Threat to Section 230 * The Implications of Excluding State Crimes from 47 U.S.C. [read post]