Search for: "Black v. United States" Results 2001 - 2020 of 4,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm by Peter Vickery
 Thirty-five years ago the Supreme Court of the United States held that in the context of higher education a state university that uses race as one of its admissions criteria must show that the use is "narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm by Peter Vickery
 Thirty-five years ago the Supreme Court of the United States held that in the context of higher education a state university that uses race as one of its admissions criteria must show that the use is "narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest." [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:42 pm by Georgetown Law Journal
Dean Kevin Johnson, University of California Davis School of Law, How Racial Profiling in America Became the Law of the Land: United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
This Essay reveals the intersection of the Court’s pretext and excessive force doctrines by unearthing their shared roots in the 1973 United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
This represents a significant setback for Russian forces and possibly undermines their control over vital shipping lanes for grain in the Black Sea. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 5:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
The Court noted that Illinois follows the approach set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Landgraf v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 12:30 pm by Guest Blogger
But then, even though the Supreme Court finally approved a state relief measure for those who couldn’t pay their mortgages in Home Building and Loan Association v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
United States (379 U.S. 241), decided on December 14, 1964, was a landmark case holding that the U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am by John Elwood
United States and Yates v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 10:25 am by Guest Blogger
Governor of Florida (also known as “Docs v Glocks”). [read post]