Search for: "CONDIT et al. v. CONDIT et al."
Results 2001 - 2020
of 3,054
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2012, 8:21 am
For example, in EEOC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:21 am
For example, in EEOC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 7:37 am
The two pharmacies allege in Rite Aid Corp et al. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:27 am
City of San Francisco, et al., supra. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 6:14 pm
Biosense Webster, et al., Civil File No. 12-621 (May 4, 2012). [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 12:32 pm
Warden Kukua, et al, was appealed to the 5th Circuit and heard at oral argument by a three-judge panel on June 4. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:00 pm
The case is Bacote, et al v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:22 am
Houston Funding II, Ltd., et al., Case No. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:24 am
Geico et al., No. 1D11-4843, Rebecca Rose began working for Geico Corp. in 1998 as an underwriter. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
Steve Szentesi & Mark Katz (First published in Competition Policy International, Antitrust Chronicle) “As a result of this alleged conspiracy, we believe that consumers paid millions of dollars more for some of the most popular titles. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
George Salti, et al. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:27 am
”Appeals of Versar, Inc., ASBCA Nos. 56857 et al., 2012 WL 1579539, April 23, 2012. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm
Conditional cross-petition for certiorari Brief for Cross-Respondents Morgan v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:11 am
The case is Schron et al v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:39 pm
Specifically, the petitioners argue that the DOI's approvals of the plans violated both the OCSLA and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) because: (1) the DOI failed to consider the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster in approving further deepwater drilling; and (2) the DOI conducted an inadequate review of the plans under NEPA, because it incorrectly applied "categorical exclusions" (from the NEPA requirements of preparing environmental assessments or… [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:36 pm
With its March 28, 2012 decision in Federal Aviation Administration, et al. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:33 pm
As explained by the Appeals Court, "In these expedited petitions for review, we consider the allegations of Native Village of Point Hope et al. and Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope (collectively, 'petitioners') that the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) failed to discharge its obligations under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) in approving Shell Offshore Inc.'s plan for exploratory oil drilling in… [read post]
30 May 2012, 9:01 am
Fishel et al., employees of companies that later merged into another company signed two-year, post-employment noncompete agreements. [read post]
