Search for: "CUSTODY OF B T S"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 2,388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2010, 3:51 pm
., d/b/a CALIPER FARMS NURSERY AND LANDSCAPING SERVICES, ET AL., __ N.J. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:31 pm
(citing N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:55 am
These provisions don't just get lip service in Peru. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:14 pm
If the parents fight and battle they can’t share legal custody. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:11 am
Code §§ 2252(a)(4)(B) and 2252(b)(2), and two counts of distribution in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 7:30 am
This has been a long time coming and it couldn't have happened soon enough. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
(b), 290.12, subd. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:08 am
T. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
Additionally, providing immediate credit for good time awards would also conflict with Section 3624(b)(2)’s requirement that good time awards for most prisoners “vest on the date the prisoner is released from custody. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 5:28 am
Don’t know about the merits of the suit, but birth control pills were probably the cause of Helen’s heart attack. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:25 pm
LEXIS 853 (FL 5/27/2010) “[T]he police, over a period of several hours of custodial interrogation, deliberately delayed administration of the warnings required by Miranda v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
John T. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:23 am
I don’t have Stanton’s motion to suppress or the government’s response to that motion, so all I know of either is what’s in this opinion. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 11:25 am
§ 1001 and a Grade B violation of his supervised release. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:10 pm
On the other line, a woman explains that her estranged husband in California wants custody of their 8 year old daughter living with her in Nevada. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
A spouse includes – (a) a former spouse; and (b) either of the biological parents of a child. [read post]
18 May 2010, 10:54 am
S. 392, 404 (1985)). [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:39 am
The question is whether a parent has a “righ[t] of custody” by reason of that parent’s ne exeat right: the authority to consent before the other parent may take the child to another country. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:45 pm
S. 621, 636 (1992) (“Federalism serves to assign political responsibility, not to obscure it”).I understand the argument, but don't find it particularly plausible in this context. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:18 am
Indeed, even though it does not reference them, the majority’s method largely tracks articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, looking at the treaty’s text first, then the context (although I don’t think they ever call it that), the treaty’s object and purpose, state practice, the negotiating history, and the views of publicists on the question. [read post]
