Search for: "Case Under Seal"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 6,727
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2019, 2:17 pm
We have previously discussed how the Criminal Justice Reform Act has broadened courts’ authority to resolve cases before arraignment, and allows more people to seal their criminal records. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:19 pm
The Supreme Court has decided personal jurisdiction cases under its 14th Amendment &ldquo [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 5:59 am
The sealed part related to some contract between Qualcomm and MediaTek, and maybe that document spoke for itself. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 11:26 am
(Criminal Cases in Japan – Q&A, Nakamura International Criminal Defense LPC). [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:39 am
The Supreme Court restored it, and that company filed for cert under seal. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:16 am
Richard Re previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 1:00 pm
Petitions for review filed under seal are highly unusual but not unprecedented – for example, Djamel Ameziane, an Algerian who lived in Canada for several years, filed a petition under seal in 2010, apparently challenging his detention at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 4:57 am
While Huawei's testimony strongly supports the FTC's case against Qualcomm (Day 2 report), and Huawei is not hypocritical with respect to the "no license-no chips" pressure tactics since it doesn't (because it couldn't even if it wanted to) capitalize on such leverage, Huawei's claims that Qualcomm's royalty demands (allegedly accounting, at least at some point, for 80%-90% of Huawei's total patent licensing costs) are supra-FRAND are… [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 5:11 am
This is another case (like Nia v. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:43 am
Interestingly, a Sidley Austin lawyer represented Huawei on Friday (he appeared in connection with a sealing matter), and that's the same firm that's asserting patents against Samsung on Huawei's behalf.Mr. van Nest (Qualcomm's lead counsel in this case) also claimed "Huawei had an extremely favorable license to begin with, sponsored in effect by the Chinese government. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm
The question is always, what is required of the judge to do so; and that will differ from case to case. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 6:39 am
Due to Stepfather’s brief being sealed, Stepfather’s argument is summarized from his jurisdictional memorandum and reply brief. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 7:56 am
The Court held that under its existing precedent, the test in a name change case is the best interest of the child, which in this case was to keep the mother’s name. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 7:14 am
Because the entire episode occurred under seal, we don’t know the specifics. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm
In the 1871 case of United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 1:54 pm
Harvard Law’s Caselaw Access Project had completed its project to digitize all U.S. case law, some 6.4 million cases dating all the way back to 1658. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Amy Howe reports for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court, that on Saturday “the Supreme Court was asked to step into a clash over a grand jury subpoena that is widely believed to be related to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into interference in the 2016 election,” when, “[i]n a filing made under seal, an unnamed corporation … apparently asked the justices to block the subpoena after the lower courts… [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 7:01 pm
In the District Court, the case is titled only “Sealed v. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 4:26 pm
The case had been kept under wraps when the U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 3:06 pm
These cases are sealed for 180 days, rather than the 60 days under the False Claims Act. [read post]
