Search for: "Childs v. State" Results 2001 - 2020 of 21,039
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2022, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Lee Anav Chung White Kim Ruger & Richter LLP v Capone  2022 NY Slip Op 31731(U) May 25, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 657197/2020 Judge: Arlene Bluth stands for the proposition that an account stated is stronger than almost any defense. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:42 am by Rosalind English
The specific test under the ECHR for justifying discrimination in the context of state benefits is set out in Stec v United Kingdom (2006) 43 EHRR 1017, a decision of the Strasbourg Grand Chamber. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:41 am
"The Supreme Court said Wednesday that state courts may apply its rulings to old cases, opening the way for an imprisoned child sex abuser to challenge his conviction. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:14 am by Susan Brenner
  The judge first addressed state action and then standing. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:17 am
8Circuit.png In trial for the production, distribution and possession of child pornography, affirming exclusion of defense expert testimony that the defendant "was not a pedophile and was not sexually attracted to young girls" to explain his "motive for taking the photographs" as irrelevant to the issue of the "sexual character" of the images, in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 2:24 pm by National Indian Law Library
State, Dep't of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (Indian Child Welfare Act, best interests of the child)Chloe O. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:18 pm
Ordering a child who gave birth to submit to intimate photographing years after the sexual abuse served no reasonable government interest and violated the Fourth Amendment and state constitutional rights of the child in her bodily integrity. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:10 am
The Supreme Court will hear two appeals this week, starting on Monday 25 October with The Child Poverty Action Group (Respondent) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Appellant). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:23 am by John Day
 But finding a jury in this state that will give damages for emotional distress to the parents for caring for a child with an illness and who state they would have rather aborted the child would be a hard sell. [read post]