Search for: "Cooper v. State" Results 2001 - 2020 of 7,449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2016, 1:56 am by INFORRM
He stated that an application for an NPO is not “interim” within the meaning of paragraph 3.1(5) of PD 6B, because the third party from whom information is sought will not be the defendant to the substantive proceedings. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:00 am by LindaMBeale
The government's dismissal of a criminal information against UBS filed in Florida-- United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:29 am
"** Section 35.g of the Civil Service Law provides, in pertinent, part, “ (g) all persons employed by any title whatsoever as members of the teaching and supervisory staff of a school district, board of cooperative educational services or county vocational education and extension board, as certified to the state commission by the commissioner of education. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 2:26 am by UKSC Blog
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet International Ltd & Anor… [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 8:49 am
Pearce Corp., (1928 Minn.) 217 N.W. 374 (operator of roller coaster held to highest degree of care equivalent to that of a common carrier); Cooper v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 3:20 am by Scott Bomboy
Two months later, a federal Appeals Court reversed Judge Lemley’s decision and the case was sent directly to the Supreme Court, which convened a special term to hear two sets of oral arguments in Cooper v. [read post]