Search for: "Deal v. Deal"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 38,451
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2014, 7:33 am
Pressured by prosecutors and busy public defenders, defendants may be be quick to accept a less-than-advantageous plea deal, simply because they assume there is little chance of successfully fighting the charges at trial. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 10:20 am
Smith v. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 10:33 am
P.F., dealing with school expulsion. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 9:14 am
In the 2010 case Victor Stanley, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:49 am
The case style is Lynn v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 1:01 pm
Hodges will be that big a deal for most employers. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 1:10 pm
In Lawrence v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:24 pm
For the purpose of these key issues I was presented with in excess of 60 ring-binders of documents, and in spite of the remarks of the President of the Queen's Bench Division, Sir Anthony May, in Khader v Aziz [2010] EWCA Civ 716; [2010] 1 WLR 2673, being drawn to the attention of the parties, the Defendants' skeleton argument, including supporting schedules, ran to over 1,000 pages, this being in addition to a witness statement of Mr Nurney dealing with the key issues,… [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 11:20 am
Now they’re facing off again in another New York court over a multi-billion-dollar deal gone bad. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 11:39 am
Chernish v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 5:09 am
Finance Express LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
See Delgado v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:45 am
At the end of an eventful week for Nokia, the Mannheim Regional Court announced its decision this morning to reject an HTC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
In Arkansas Times LP v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:48 am
In Moncrieffe v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 12:17 pm
In the case of Siegel Development, LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:52 am
Last week, they issued their ruling in Rosemond v. [read post]