Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 2001 - 2020 of 29,811
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2022, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
Playgirl, Inc., 292 F.3d 1078 (9th Cir. 2002), the court found false light in the use of an actor’s photo on the cover of Playgirl magazine. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
The ICO found that Interserve had failed to put appropriate technical and organisational measures in place to secure personal data (in contravention of Articles 5(1)(f) and 32 GDPR) for a period of 20 months. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:00 pm by OTy9gYz
Ackerley Group, Inc., 423 F.3d 107, 113 (2d Cir. 2005) (quoting Celle, 209 F.3d at 177). [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 1:20 pm by Giles Peaker
That Act clearly treats recovery as including the obtaining of money not previously paid out by a claimant to a defendant. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 3:47 pm by Kalvis Golde
United States 22-340Issue: Whether a defendant satisfies the criteria in 18 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
District Policy I(F) is entitled "Curriculum and Parental Rights" and provides for parental review of instructional materials and opt out rights related to instruction that conflicts with their First Amendment beliefs. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 10:02 am by Eric Caligiuri
On July 12, 2022, the Court issued a scheduling order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) which stated that the “[l]ast day to amend without proceeding under Fed. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 8:23 am by Eric Goldman
” The court continues (emphasis added): Anderson insists that she is not attacking Defendants’ actions as publishers because her claims do not require Defendants to remove or alter the content generated by third parties. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 1:09 pm by Andrew Frisch
The district court agreed, granted the defendants’ motion, and dismissed the case. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court unanimously held that, under the First Amendment, to maintain a claim for defamation, a public official must prove that the defendant acted with “actual malice”: that is, the defendant made the statement with with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:38 am by Jennifer González
” The Comics Code administrator Charles F. [read post]