Search for: "Douglas v. Douglas"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 4,170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
See Bart v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:22 am
Douglas NeJaime & Reva SiegelAs religious liberty objections to marriage continue to mount, what does Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 12:26 pm
The court cited, inter alia, Douglas Cnty. v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 11:49 am
Nixon v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:36 am
For example, in O’Day v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:36 am
For example, in O’Day v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 5:41 pm
For one thing, Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:53 pm
In Gumbs v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
Back in February, the Court of Appeal in IPCom v Vodafone overturned the first instance decision of Mr Recorder Douglas Campbell QC who held that Vodafone could benefit from what seems to be the somewhat mythical defence of Crown use. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:10 am
In Gunn v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 12:26 pm
If the panel doesn't agree that the "causal nexus" requirement should apply only to preliminary (pre-trial) and not permanent (post-trial) injunctions, then it may decide to proposal a full-court review of the matter, which would mean a second hearing before a final Federal Circuit ruling comes down.In May the Federal Circuit -- a panel led by the court's Chief Judge Randall Rader -- reversed a denial of a permanent patent injunction in a snowplow case (Douglas Dynamics, LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 11:54 am
It upheld the lower court decision.The dissent, written by Judge Servitto, referred to a US Supreme Court case McDonnell Douglas Corp v Green, 411 US 792, as a framework for evaluating age-discrimination claims. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 7:20 am
Judge Douglas B. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
Dacon, 759 F.2d 989].When a Title VII discrimination claim is based on circumstantial evidence, as was here the case, the court said it applied "the familiar McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework to determine whether the plaintiff has shown sufficient evidence to survive [a motion for] summary judgment". [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
Dacon, 759 F.2d 989].When a Title VII discrimination claim is based on circumstantial evidence, as was here the case, the court said it applied "the familiar McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework to determine whether the plaintiff has shown sufficient evidence to survive [a motion for] summary judgment". [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 11:37 am
(H-06-182), U.S. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:25 am
Douglas, whom he despised, Bickel could not and would not simply dismiss Black. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:30 am
by Steve Vladeck Just two days ago, in his dissent in Douglas v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:32 am
” The Circuit Court also noted that in Zelnik v. [read post]
