Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 3,672
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
, 19 Michigan State Journal of International Law 251-277 (2011). [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 4:10 am
Zipursky, Snyder v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 4:22 am
we can’t be a threat if we can’t ever agree on anything and every state has its own regulatory, ethical, legal, and economic scheme that attempts to claw away at every other state’s regime. bastard coated bastards: last but not least, let’s not ignore the possibility that we’re all just bastards. i mean, i’m not a people person anyway. what do i look like, an mba? [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 6:33 am
” The Court held that the right had been infringed by the state in confiscating spermicidal jelly which she had ordered from England on medical advice. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
Indeed, she provides an array of legal actions involving Quakers, perhaps most famously, Tinker v. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 2:56 pm
Lonham Group Ltd v Scotbeef Ltd & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 203 (05 March 2025) [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 5:44 am
" United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:22 am
In 2005, the Supreme Court held that the transfer of branded software constitutes a sale and is exigible to sales tax, levied by State Governments under Entry 54, Schedule VII of the Constitution (Tata Consultancy Services v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 9:45 pm
Rolph has been facing a challenge from lawyers for Omar Ahmed Khadr, the first detainee involved in a case before the CMCR (U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 3:27 am
As Ukraine treats embassies as being part of the “host state”, the marriage had to comply with Ukrainian law. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 2:36 pm
This stated that: Your case has been rebooked to be heard on 23 July 2009. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm
Lyon Docket: 11-80 Issue: (1) Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b), courts may adjudicate and compromise legal rights in land to which the United States holds title without the United States’s participation in the litigation; and (2) whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
It was serendipitous that the author of the tweet, Mr Modi, is both a well known figure, resident in England, and ready to come forward. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:32 pm
OBG Ltd et al v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 11:00 pm
NFTs are legal property…A recent case in the High Court recognised NFTs as property under the law of England and Wales. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:17 pm
” Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 5:36 am
In 2015 in Michigan v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:27 pm
R (Jakimaviciute) v LB Hammersmith and Fulham [2013] EWHC 4372 (Admin) [Not generally available yet. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 1:30 pm
” Steele v. [read post]
