Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2019, 3:50 am
In two recent decisions (“Unwired Planet” and “Conversant”) (Unwired Planet v Huawei [2018] EWCA Civ 2344, IPKat post here; Huawei v Conversant [2019] EWCA Civ 38, IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal has endorsed this practice.Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
Upon excluding ambassadorships to English-speaking states, the gap was even larger (56 percent versus 28 percent). [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 3:52 pm
s maiden case Elavon Financial Services DAC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:36 am
" District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:36 am
" District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm
(discussing the doctrine of foreign equivalents in the context of denying registration for geographically deceptively misdescriptive marks); see also Palm Bay Imports v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 12:18 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 8:29 am
The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 8:00 am
" District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:50 am
The Dutch Journal on Private International Law (Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht) publishes papers in Dutch and in English. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
", considers the interaction between the specific jurisdictional rules regarding claims involving EU unitary IP rights and the jurisdictional rules under the Brussels regulation in light of the CJEU decisions in case C-617/15 (Hummel v Nike) and joined Cases C-24/16 and C-25/16 (Nintendo v BigBen Interactive) and the subsequent English court’s decision in Poul Chang Metal Industry Company Ltd v Bailcast Ltd and Anor.Book ReviewsSpecialKat Hayleigh… [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Both place their faith in the state, and in the community, to be sure. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:27 am
Novelty of claim 1 was attacked based upon United States Patent No. 5,058,198 to Rocci. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 1:31 pm
The state appealed to the Supreme Court, which announced in January that it would review the case, Lamone v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 11:12 am
"The case reference is HTC Corp. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:06 am
The General Court noted that this conclusion was added for the sake of completeness and was not operative, and therefore the failure to state reasons did not matter. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Excellent oral and written English skills, good understanding of French and/or Spanish. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:44 pm
No English cases doing so have been uncovered either. [read post]
