Search for: "Eastes v. Eastes" Results 2001 - 2020 of 6,740
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
In the case of David v Hosany [2017] EWHC 2787 (QB), His Honour Judge Moloney QC considered a libel claim brought by the claimant, a Governor of the East London Foundation NHS Trust, in respect of three publications by the defendant, another Governor of the same Trust. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 2:00 pm by EEM
," Nordic Journal of International Law, vol. 86, no. 4 (2017)Law Reviews"Interpreting Injustice: The Department of Homeland Security’s Failure to Comply with Federal Language Access Requirements in Immigration Detention," Harvard Latinx Law Review, vol. 20 (Spring 2017)"Jennings v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 1:09 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals approved the use of hypnosis in a case called Zani v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:53 am by Garrett Hinck
Wittes conceded that he is now alarmed by the lack of progress in ACLU v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 3:59 am by Garrett Hinck
Robert Chesney argued that the government's arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 8:51 am by Garrett Hinck
Peter Margulies summarized oral arguments at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Hawaii v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 6:41 pm by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
But the court distinguished the type of analysis criticized in Reynolds by emphasizing that the cell-site analysis in Pembrook's case spanned "a much larger geographical area" -- i.e., state-to-state, East v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:09 am
December 6, 2017 - 11 AM: CrossFit, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 4:53 am by Garrett Hinck
Dana Stuster updated the Middle East Ticker, covering the attack on a mosque in Sinai, U.S. [read post]
His problems include, among other things, an alleged kidnapping plot, a plan to build nuclear power plants all over the Middle East, alleged violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) involving at least two different countries, and apparent false statements to the FBI. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:33 am by Ben
”The relevant case law for commandments 1 to 10 seems to be:        Fylde Microsystems Ltd v Key Radio Systems Ltd [1998] FSR 449         Levy v Rutley (1871) (1871) LR 6 CP         Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503       Wiseman v George Weidenfeld & Nicolson Ltd [1985] FSR 525        Fylde Microsystems Ltd… [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:25 am
”The relevant case law for commandments 1 to 10 seems to be:         Fylde Microsystems Ltd v Key Radio Systems Ltd [1998] FSR 449         Levy v Rutley (1871) (1871) LR 6 CP         Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503       Wiseman v George Weidenfeld & Nicolson Ltd [1985] FSR 525        Fylde Microsystems Ltd v Key Radio Systems… [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 11:50 am by Scott R. Anderson, Yishai Schwartz
The United States described the evolution of its position on Jerusalem from this point forward in its 2014 merits brief in the matter of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 2:04 am
In  concluding that Kogan had not sufficiently contributed to the screenplay [para 85], even by adding to the first three drafts, Hacon J considered the following points and authorities:  Adding elements not themselves covered by copyright, such as scenic effects, is not a sufficient contribution (as per Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503)Providing helpful criticism and expert feedback on the work is not a sufficient contribution (as per Wiseman v George Weidenfeld &… [read post]