Search for: "English v. State" Results 2001 - 2020 of 6,403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2014, 2:33 am by David Smith
Therefore the stairs and mezzanine were not storeys in an ordinary English sense. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 1:05 am by Rose Hughes
 Mr Justice Birss observed in Illumina v MGI that a limiting definition of a feature in the description, limits the scope of the claim. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 4:30 am by Administrator
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: Subar v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:11 am by Daniel P. Hart
  (For our readers in the Garden State, that’s the Crown Dependency in the English Channel, not the home of Bon Jovi and Tony Soprano.) [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:11 am by Daniel P. Hart
  (For our readers in the Garden State, that’s the Crown Dependency in the English Channel, not the home of Bon Jovi and Tony Soprano.) [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 1:39 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
The court notes that, during the sign-up process, an alert states “BY CREATING AN UBER ACCOUNT, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF SERVICE & PRIVACY POLICY. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:50 am by Susan Brenner
De La Garza “realized Gaona–Gomez did not speak English so he spoke to him in Spanish. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 7:22 am by CMS
The employee’s policy stated, in what the Supreme Court described as “admirably simple English”, that the insured was covered “if you have an accident in your vehicle and you kill or injure someone, you damage their property or you damage their vehicle”. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 3:07 am
Spirits, 563 F.3d at 1353, 90 USPQ2d at 1493; see Corporacion Habanos, S.A. v. [read post]