Search for: "Federal, Inc." Results 2001 - 2020 of 57,577
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2009, 9:50 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- The Federal Circuit today affirmed a determination by the District Court for the District of Delaware that U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:53 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.Omegaflex, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 11:46 pm
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:55 am
Farr has accused CSX Transportation, Inc. of negligence under the Federal Employers Liability Act. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 1:06 am
Read more More On Monolithic In Vol.6, No.4 (April 2009) of the Federal Evidence Review Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:38 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
The CFPB and New York Attorney General have agreed to a settlement with Sterling Jewelers Inc. of a lawsuit they filed jointly in a New York federal district court alleging federal and state law violations in connection with credit cards issued by Sterling that could only be used to finance purchases made in the company’s stores. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 9:38 am
An eight person federal jury has returned a unanimous verdict in favor of the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:48 am by GPMfeeds
If you suffered a loss on your PlayAGS investments or would like to inquire about potentially pursuing claims to recover your loss under the federal securities laws, you can submit your contact information at: https://www.glancylaw.com/cases/playags-inc/. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 5:05 am
Federer first signed with Nike in 1994, when he was a fresh-faced 13 year old. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:15 am by Steve Brachmann
Marcel Fashion Group, Inc., the Court will determine whether federal preclusion principles bar defendants from raising defenses that could have been raised in previous cases between the same parties, even when the plaintiff asserts new claims. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 7:48 pm by Patent Docs
Sandoz, Inc.), the Federal Circuit has increased the quantum of explanation it requires from district courts (and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board even more frequently) in reviewing questions of fact for clear error (see, e.g., Tris Pharma, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:16 am by lennyesq
Pro Se Coordinator NDNY Federal Court Bar Association, Inc. [read post]