Search for: "Garcia v. Garcia"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 2,260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2008, 6:48 pm
So far, the Sixth Circuit in Garcia v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 12:59 pm
Who got it right -- the Sixth Circuit in Garcia v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 1:47 pm
Burke v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, November 05, 2008 US v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:28 pm
Garcia, 4256, 73/05, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2008 NY Slip Op 7755; 2008 N.Y. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 8:35 pm
I read a lot of cases. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Garcia-Ruiz, No. 07-51269 Conviction for reentry into the U.S. as a deported alien is affirmed over an objection that police lacked reasonable suspicion to stop and detain defendant, where defendant had mooted the issue by stipulating to facts establishing all the elements of the charged crime. .. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 7:25 pm
In Garcia v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 2:52 am
Garcia v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 6:35 pm
Garcia v. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 5:12 am
State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 3:41 pm
Contents include:Guy Goodwin-Gill, International Law Association (Australian Branch) Annual General Meeting AddressAnn Kent, Compliance v Cooperation: China and International LawDonald Keever, The Regulatory Coherence of Multilateral RegulationJo En Low, Engaging with the United Nations Treaty Bodies: A Fruitful Dialogue? [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 8:42 pm
.; Wilfrido Garcia v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 4:33 pm
Garcia v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 3:27 pm
Since the Jan. 9 decision of Jesus Arrieta v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 3:22 am
Garcia, 475 F.3d 1029, 1035 (9th Cir. 2007). [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 2:50 pm
Mishler v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:03 am
Care Servs. of NY, P.C. a/a/o Vanessa Garcia v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 3:26 pm
A pretty good panel gives us a pretty disappointing decision, in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Garcia-Alvarez, No. 071471, 071697 Conviction for carjacking and firearms offenses is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence proffered against defendant was not sufficient; and 2) the district court erred in denying defendant's motion for a new trial. [read post]
