Search for: "Germany v. Germany"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 4,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2022, 3:28 pm
The 14-week limits that exist in France and Germany are good examples. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
The dispute had led to a referral to the CJEU, which was decided on 16 July 2015 (Case C-580/13 Coty Germany GmbH v Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg, on which see the Katpost here). [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
Never Too Late 69 [week ending on Sunday 25 October] – The 10 Commandments of IP Dispute Resolution | Republic of Cyprus v OHIM on halloumi | Case C-20/14 BGW Marketing- & Management-Service GmbH v Bodo Scholz | Passing off at common law and statutory passing off | Coty v Stadtsparkasse, back to Germany | EU Trade Secrets Draft Directive | “GREASECUTTER” and General Court | IP in the Fashion… [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:39 am
The Court also heard oral arguments in Hall v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:08 pm
Following Buck v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 2:55 am
There was no suggestion in submissions that the place of contract was, for example, Germany. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:08 pm
Following Buck v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:36 pm
Canada Sapra v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:07 am
The case of Wolf v Stadt Frankfurt Am Main heard before the European Court of Justice (ECJ) held that it was lawful for an upper age limit of 30 to be applied by the Federal state of Hesse in Germany on recruiting firemen. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:03 am
Casey (1992), Virginia v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 8:36 pm
She wanted to go back to Germany, but was not allowed to do so by her father. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 8:21 am
CC Rainer Lück 1RL.de, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesverfassungsgericht_IMGP1634.jpg I. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 10:31 am
The Court of Justice of the European Communities handed down its decision in Case C-385/07 P Der Grüne Punkt-Duales System Deutschland GmbH v European Commission, supported by Vfw AG, Landbell AG and BellandVision GmbH, nearly 26 months after the ruling of the Court of First Instance which this 198 paragraph decision upholds.For those whose memory may not instantly recall the decision of 24 May 2007 or the facts that led to it, let the IPKat recap ...The German… [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:01 am
Mentioned is also the English case O v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:01 am
The court held that the enforcement provision Article V (1) lit. a New York Convention applies already before or during arbitral proceedings. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:43 pm
SOCAN and Rogers, et al. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm
This is a special guest post by Romanian attorney Smaranda Miron, LL.M, who practices atFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP in Frankfurt, Germany, on the Court of Arbitration for Sport ordering Romanian football player Adrian Mutu to pay 17 million to Chelsea. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 9:54 am
| Sheeran v Chokri Part 2: Admission of similar fact evidence | New Year, Same Creative Authorship Requirement in US Copyright | Reader discount for IPKat book award titles! [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 1:33 am
The EU should do something about Turner v. [read post]
