Search for: "Good v. Good" Results 2001 - 2020 of 76,276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2010, 6:30 pm by constitutional lawblogger
The pros and cons of powerpoint in the classroom are hotly debated, but for ConLawProfs who like a good illustration to enliven their classrooms with a bit a humor, the below image of a Dutch bus from copyranter via Above... [read post]
23 Jul 2006, 11:12 am
  The case no is 1:03-cv-08484-NRB entitled Yeda Research v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 9:55 am
” Over at White Collar Crime Prof blog, Ellen Podgor writes that Judge Block, in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 12:45 am by INFORRM
 Smith v TalkTalk Telecom Group plc [2022] EWHC 1311 (QB) (27 May 2022) concerned claims for damages for both breaches; whilst Sterritt v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2022] NIQB 43 (09 June 2022) concerned the privacy of one of the hackers involved in the second breach. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 3:00 am
Teleflex:Solveig Singleton, titled: KSR v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:20 am
D’Onofrio (2005), 77 O.R. (3d) 583 (C.A.), which holds that novel causes of action are best determined on a fully developed record at trial rather than on a summary judgment motion, remains good law after Combined Air Mechanical Services Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:33 am by Giles Peaker
The High Court held: Any decision on ‘good reason’ was not influenced by the merits of the appeal – Short v Birmingham City Council (2005) EWHC 2112. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:38 pm
Perhaps a little context will explain this quote from Seybert v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:38 pm
Perhaps a little context will explain this quote from Seybert v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:52 am by Eric Goldman
Still, the contract formation news has not been all good for Uber. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 1:56 am
Regina (TNT Post UK Ltd) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners (Royal Mail Group Ltd, interested party) Case C-357/07 Court of Justice of the European Communities “The Royal Mail was exempt from value-added tax as a supplier of public postal services, except for supplies of goods or services whose terms had been individually negotiated. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 8:14 pm by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
The fact that the sale in Starways Trading v Pearl Island Trading was said to be ‘ex-warehouse’ was not a provision to the contrary. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 4:04 am
Conviction of a crime and employment pursuant a "Certificate of Relief from Disabilities" or a "Certificate of Good Conduct"Camulaire v Board of Education, NYS Supreme Court, [Not officially reported]In May 1996 Arnold Camulaire applied to the New York City Board of Education for a teaching license and listed a criminal conviction on his application form. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 2:10 pm by Giles Peaker
Real misery is being caused to no good purpose. [read post]