Search for: "Graham v State" Results 2001 - 2020 of 2,167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2015, 11:14 am by Jay Levine and Ryan Graham
As the ALJ stated in the ruling “it is unsurprising that, historically, liability for unfair conduct has been imposed only upon proof of actual consumer harm. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:00 am
The Court found preemption of state unfair competition law, then upheld state coverage for sound recordings (then unprotected by copyright) in Goldstein, then upheld state trade secret and contract law, then found preemption of a state law prohibiting copying of boat hulls. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Trial court’s instructions that the jury “will determine what the assault was” did not amount to an improper expression of opinion on the evidence in context; (2) The trial court’s response to a jury question during deliberations regarding a prior conviction was an not impermissible expression of opinion on the evidence State v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Denham, who was the government’s preferred candidate, will replace outgoing Information Commissioner Christopher Graham who has served since 2009. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself:  see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9]        A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:21 am by Joel R. Brandes
Defendant stated that the discovery he sought was relevant to the issue whether plaintiff's actions caused appreciation to the separate property which should then be included in the marital estate. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 10:10 am by Scott R. Anderson
In its 1983 decision in the matter of INS v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Graham Smith has published his tweets about the draft bill on his cybereagle blog. [read post]