Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS" Results 2001 - 2020 of 36,748
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2023, 7:58 am by Dan Farber
The Threat to Agency Enforcement Power A second case, SEC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Ben Sperry
Instead, they are about whether such laws place the burden of avoiding harms on the least-cost avoider. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:37 am by Peter Mahler
Earlier this year, using as a springboard the Maryland intermediate appellate court’s decision in Eastland Food Corp. v Mekhaya, I posted about a topic on which there’s little or no New York law, viz., whether a complaint for minority shareholder oppression stated a valid claim centered on allegations that the directors/majority shareholders, instead of declaring profit distributions for all shareholders, were taking disguised distributions in the form of excessive compensation… [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:30 am by Gareth Davies
Frontex could not be said to have caused any harm since it did not take the relevant decisions (para 66). [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 2:30 am by Felix Mikolasch
Simply any proven harm stemming from a GDPR violation needs to be compensated. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 7:49 am by Eric Goldman
Withdrawing its false allegations and frivolous arguments after the fact would do nothing to punish Expeditee for its misconduct or remedy the harm it inflicted on Respect the Look. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
Third, why make onerous venue selection clauses that harm policyholders by making them litigate away from the policyholder’s community? [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 8:26 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Again, we consider the whole picture in sizing up a case.While the district court said plaintiff suffered no tangible harm, the Court (Chin, Carney and Robinson) reminds us that no psychological harm is required under Harris v. [read post]