Search for: "HEAD v. CALIFORNIA" Results 2001 - 2020 of 2,908
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of California for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by jpfaff
In my next post, I’ll look at how the dissent—which dives head-first into the medical literature on shaken baby syndrome—uses scientific evidence. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 9:14 am by Mike Danko
   In November 2009, a Piasecki helicopter struck high tension wires shortly after departing from Adelanto airport as it headed for an airshow in Riverside, California. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 6:05 pm
Autos involved in this latest recall include the: • Civic (2001 - 2003 models) • Accord (A number of 2001 - 2002 models) • Odyssey (2001 - 2003 models) • CR-V (2002 and 2003 models) • Acura 3.2 TL (2002 and 2003 models) • Acura 3.2 CL (2003 model) While airbags that work properly can save lives, defective ones can prove dangerous during an Orange County, California car crash. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Couvillion, Note, Defending for its life: ChampionsWorld LLC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 11:34 am by Russell Beck
The case is related to the federal criminal charges brought against the employee, who was headed to China. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 2:51 am by SHG
LexisNexis is approved for telephonic/Webinar training on this topic in the following states: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New York? [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 11:14 am
  He decided to frisk someone who had a knife sheath on his belt, and when he turned his back to the other youths to conduct the frisk, one of them pulled a gun and shot him in the head. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
  Maurice Ruffin was a prisoner, and a guard saw a female visitor with her head in his lap in the visiting area. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:05 am by Above the Law
“Rich is considered one of the top Jones Day trial attorneys in California. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:00 am by Katherine Gallo
California and Federal courts have found that a party has control over the following individuals and entities for purposes of producing documents: A Party’s Lawyer Smith v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:00 am by Katherine Gallo
To me, this means that the obligation is well beyond an attorney dictating a response off the top of his head and looking through his file. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by Mandelman
  Well, if I remember correctly, there was a whole gaggle of talking heads acting kind of superior and questioning why the group was protesting and what their goals were? [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:52 am by Bexis
  2011 WL 5008008, at *3.There’s also Stevens v. [read post]