Search for: "Idaho Supreme Court" Results 2001 - 2020 of 2,031
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2007, 12:41 pm
  Fortunately, sanity prevailed in the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 11:43 am
The Supreme Court held that "wholly random searches are essential to the effective security of penal institutions," and do not violate an inmate's Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Stripped to its essentials, any federal preemption argument amounts to the proposition that "supreme" federal power requires/encourages me/my client to do what we're doing. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Five of the states which have resumed executions, Connecticut, Idaho, New Mexico, Oregon and Pennsylvania, have yet to execute a "non-volunteer". [read post]
15 May 2007, 9:53 am
The Idaho Supreme Court ruled that e-mail exchanged between government employees is public record. [read post]
8 May 2007, 12:39 pm
Might as well get the California Supreme Court's actual view rather than guessing at it. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
Anyway, the Illinois Supreme Court held that the rule against governments funding operations through litigation could not be circumvented by calling the proceedings "public nuisance. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 4:47 pm
This leaves us with irreconcilable directives from the Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 8:51 am
Meanwhile, the Idaho Supreme Court is considering the paper's lawsuit to obtain records in a similar case involving the same prosecutor's office. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 9:29 pm
I came up to Boise yesterday for the Idaho Supreme Court's annual memorial service for the judges and lawyers who died in past year, one of whom, readers of this blog may recall, was my dad, who was a state court trial judge in Idaho for many years. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 5:24 pm
The case comes a month after the Supreme Court invalidated a $79.5 punitive damages award made against Altria, ruling that corporate defendants can no longer be punished for harms suffered by consumers who aren't party to a lawsuit. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:20 am
The 9th (a reluctant Reinhardt concurred reluctantly by Noonan and Fernandez) hold that the state supreme court had ruled that the nature of the offense (cruelty) could be a basis for denying parole, even when all the other rehabilitative factors were positive. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 3:01 am
(Thanks to Gerry Neuman for this point.)Prediction: This part of the opinion will not survive Supreme Court review. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 12:56 pm
Supreme Court has not ruled in this area of the law, state courts do not have to adhere to any one standard unless the highest court in the state (usually called that state's supreme court) has adopted a standard. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 1:58 am
Today and tomorrow I am attending the American Health Lawyer Association's Hospitals and Health Systems Law Institute in Las Vegas where I am speaking on Healthcare Blogging and Web 2.0. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:58 am
Supreme Court directives about the importance of good defense counsel. [read post]