Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 12,636
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2014, 7:49 am
” That line was so important to Justice Breyer’s majority opinion that he felt it needed to be italicized. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 7:46 am
Circuit opinion. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:13 am
In banc review happens when the entire 10-member (or so) court re-hears an appeal originally decided by a three-judge panel. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 7:33 pm
For those who need to understand the prerequisites for, and limitations of, maintaining court filings as confidential, the recent Delaware Court of Chancery opinion must be read in the matter styled: In re Appraisal of Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc., Cons. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 4:17 am
In a dissenting opinion, however, Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg sided with the Second Circuit, arguing that the bankruptcy court had exceeded its jurisdiction by barring the suits. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 5:52 am
So far as we can tell, the money quotes (we assume they're valued in euros) appear in paragraphs 166 to 169 of the opinion. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:07 am
Of course, the justices are an opinionated bunch. [read post]
15 May 2008, 4:07 pm
Click In Re Marriage and you'll see the 172 page opinion from the Supreme Court of California today. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:50 pm
Thumma, said the justices had never really said precisely what dictionary definitions were doing in legal opinions. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 2:35 pm
Hear, hear.The next paragraph of Justice Gilbert's opinion reads:"In Green v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:53 am
If you’re a Court watcher, you’ve undoubtedly been hooked this week reading all about President Obama’s nomination of Solicitor General Elena Kagan to be an Associate Justice on the Court. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 12:06 pm
Of course that's what you're doing. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 4:27 pm
I was even more surprised when I saw that the opinion was written by Justice Tucher, who's incredibly smart and (I'd have thought) eminently reasonable.It's an insurance coverage case, which I understand will make a ton of readers instantly disinterested in the outcome. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:36 am
If you don’t realize this, you’re nuts. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:46 am
The Department of Justice of the United States is wellaware of these proceedings and has not chosen to seek ourintervention. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:39 pm
" In re Medley, 134 U. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 4:41 am
But that didn’t happen because Earl Warren issued an edict, told his fellow justices to do as he tells them or else, or stood up in conference and told them, “I’m CJ and you’ll do as you’re told. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 6:27 pm
George, you're going to need it. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 2:08 pm
Thompson), Justice O'Connor's opinion for the majority began with what are now familiar, if still chilling, words to capital litigators.This is a case about federalism. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:33 am
Many of the opinions I held then are still opinions that I hold today. [read post]
