Search for: "In re Davis" Results 2001 - 2020 of 4,997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2021, 4:09 am by Chris Seaton
The second is re-casting Viola Davis as Amanda Waller. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 3:49 am by Peter Mahler
Earlier this month, in In re Dissolution of Doehler Dry Ingredient Solutions, LLC, Mem. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 8:36 am
Below we have presented some useful statistics that shed greater light on who's blogging, how much of it they're doing and other trends of law blogs today. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:05 am by Lyle Denniston
Phillips of Los Angeles, countered that “thinking twice is not a severe burden,” the Chief Justice retorted: “Well, if you’re thinking twice and one way you’re thinking is not to do it, that sounds like a sufficient burden. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Spent no time on that, parody wouldn’t help b/c parody just means they’re the same [parity].Panelists:         Nathan Siegel, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP: Cultural trend favoring celebrities, and willingness to view a celebrity’s “story” as quasi-property of the celebrity. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
A year ago, almost to the day, my (co-authored) Verdict column focused on the lessons to be learned from a high-profile and boisterous protest by Stanford Law School students at a Federalist Society Speaker Event featuring Judge Kyle Duncan, a conservative Trump-appointed judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
In re Neurontin Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, -- F. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
An important case pending before the Supreme Court may provide important guidance on the question whether the Equal Protection Clause prohibits states from denying government subsidies to religious organizations who will use the funds for religious purposes. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:57 am by lawshucks
We’re often accused of being BigLaw apologists (btw, stop emailing and start commenting if you have something to say!) [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Council of Canadian Law Deans
Shortly after the Supreme Court of Canada upheld Klippert’s sentence, the Parliament of Canada – it was the era of Trudeau père – partially decriminalized sodomy, in 1969. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:35 am
The claims we're ticked off about at the moment involve a disconnect between the allegations and the facts. [read post]