Search for: "In re I.S." Results 2001 - 2020 of 13,491
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2011, 3:35 am by John L. Welch
[i.e., the portions shown in solid lines in the drawings].Examining Attorney Douglas M. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 10:15 am
In re Innovative Companies, LLC, Serial No. 76607252 (June 18, 2008) [precedential].Drawing/Specimen Issue: Applicant originally filed for the mark FREEDOMSTONE as a single word mark. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:17 am by Joshua L. Firth
(In Re: Actos [Pioglitazone] Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2299, No. 6:11-md-2299, Allen v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 9:13 am by Moses & Rooth
This word, along with other legal jargon, may not be one that you’re familiar with. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:43 am by Marc Mayerson
The case, In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation (5th Cir. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:43 am by John L. Welch
”"In this case, we note that applicant’s purchasers, i.e., its “highly sophisticated” investors are “high net worth institutions and accredited individuals. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:58 am by John L. Welch
"The Board noted that if a mark is a double entendre, i.e., if it has two meanings, the mark is not merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 12:20 pm by Jessica Grigsby
Whether we’ve glanced back at a mischievous two-year old with a look of disapproval, or satisfied that nagging hunger pang with a drive-thru #2, or dialed a loved-one with an excuse for being late, we're guilty as charged. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 5:41 am by PaperStreet Web Design
Whether you’re applying for SSI benefits for the first time, appealing a denial of benefits, filing for modification of existing benefits, or otherwise pursuing a claim under the Social Security Act, you are legally entitled to be represented by an attorney for such purposes. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 9:06 am
” (By the way, if you’re not following Peg on Twitter, you should be.) [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 3:29 am by John L. Welch
In re Accelerate s.a.l., 101 USPQ2d 2047 (TTAB 2012) [precedential].Likelihood of confusion: The same test for likelihood of confusion applies to certification marks as to trademarks: the duPont analysis. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 4:49 am
[You may have guessed one of these grounds].As to 2(e)(2), the Board found the primary significance of NORMANDIE CAMEMBERT to be a generally-known geographic place, i.e., Normandy, France. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 3:54 am by Charles Sartain
(i.e. language in the new lease making it subordinate, or restricting the new lease’s grant, or limiting the grant to a different interest from that conveyed by the prior lease). [read post]
11 May 2011, 3:12 am by John L. Welch
In re Oliver Wine Co., Inc., Serial No. 77681936 (April 15, 2011)[not precedential].The 2(e)(1) refusal was based on the Examining Attorney's "assumption" that a type of grape known as "heritage" grapes are a significant ingredient of Applicant Oliver's wine. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 11:26 am by Demetrius J. Robinson
If you’re an Ohio State Buckeye fan, your New Year did not begin exactly how you wanted to, but the year looks bright going forward. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 11:14 pm by Dan Wallach
I'm going to skip the politics and focus on the fact that the Republicans used Wisconsin's FOIA mechanism to ask for a wide variety of his emails and they're likely to get them. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:22 am
A requester who is not the patent owner (i.e., a "third party requester") has only limited participation rights in the proceeding. [read post]