Search for: "In the Matter of: Graham"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 2,073
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2007, 11:44 pm
Graham, 489 U.S. 838, 840-41, 109 S.Ct. 1519, 103 L.Ed.2d 924(1989). [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 12:51 pm
I have been tough on Jim Webb due to his refusal to consider using the Spending Power to end the Iraq Debacle and I will continue to be, but one thing I always have believed is that Jim Webb, like Wes Clark, conveys confidence, even arrogance, when discussing national security issues that; something Democrats desperately need as a political matter. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 11:23 pm
Graham, 490 U.S. at 396. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 1:27 pm
The Federal Circuit's decision turned on its finding of clear error in the district court's determination of the level of ordinary skill in the art, one of the Graham factors. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 3:49 am
Layne Christensen Company, et al. (06/29/2007, non-precedential): appeal of judgment as a matter of law that the asserted claims of the patent-in-suit are invalid for obviousness, and appeal by patentee of sanctions for discovery misconduct (both affirmed); discussion of patent related to stimulating, refurbishing, or otherwise increasing production from water wells (U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:26 am
Scooter Libby, who was convicted (in the place of more serious crimes and perpetrators) of lying to Congress about matters of state has just had his 30 month sentence commuted. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 1:57 am
Even the attempt of Alexander Graham Bell to re-write history in the first Langley Medal presentation could not change what happened.See alsohttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/04/more-on-bad-coverage-by-union-tribune.htmlhttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2006/07/simpsonftcr-file-re-exam-request-on-3.htmlhttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2006/07/arguments-concerning-re-exam-of-warfs.html****Forbes also picked up the AP story, but did not evaluate its accuracy.From the text:Competing scientists have jumped into… [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:47 am
The Court stated that the Graham v. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 6:13 am
At pages 360-1, Tobin notes that Alexander Graham Bell, in presenting the first Langley Award to the Wrights, congratulated the Wrights for bringing the aerodrome to the commercial and practical stage. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 8:11 am
The CAFC noted that Pfizer had simply failed in this matter to prove that the results were unexpected. [read post]
30 May 2007, 8:40 pm
Texas Tech Professor Ann Graham over at Banking Law Prof Blog has some tough words for purveyors "liar loans. [read post]
30 May 2007, 7:06 pm
That austere standard, absent from the statute and incompatible with case law of the Supreme Court (including Graham v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
" The Court noted that "[w]hat matters is the objective reach of the claim," and whether there was at the time of the invention "an obvious solution" for a "known problem. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:25 pm
Alexander Graham Bell, but not Meucci, is mentioned, and of course the Selden patent is brought up. [read post]
4 May 2007, 9:38 pm
Graham, 383 U.S., at 17, 86 S. [read post]
2 May 2007, 3:46 am
""The Court of Appeals failed to recognize that the problem motivating the patentee may be only one of many addressed by the patent's subject matter. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:33 am
There is no necessary inconsistency between the TSM test and the Graham analysis. [read post]
1 May 2007, 6:20 am
Since the Federal Circuit was formed and entrusted with jurisdiction over patent appeals, the Supreme Court once largely deferred to it on patent matters. [read post]
1 May 2007, 3:40 am
[is] properly analyzed under the Fourth Amendment's "objective reasonableness" standard.' Graham v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 3:15 am
[is] properly analyzed under the Fourth Amendment's "objective reasonableness" standard.' Graham v. [read post]
